Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Remove Facebook Group: Our historical sites are listed at CATUG_websites#Historic_sites) |
(→Remove Facebook Group: is the note on the front page too cryptic about where to find our historical sites?) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:Yes, that would be [[CATUG_websites#Historic_sites]]. | :Yes, that would be [[CATUG_websites#Historic_sites]]. | ||
: | :Slightly disappointed that you had to ask, because there is a signpost of how to find that right under the Facebook link that you are talking about! It's meant to get people exploring using the Categories, but apparently it is too cryptic in practice. Oh dear. Perhaps I need to build more familiar-looking index pages. | ||
:As for the FB Group: would it be premature to remove it? I don't understand the changes on FB. [[User:N Reid|N Reid]] ([[User talk:N Reid|talk]]) 17:05, 20 January 2012 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 23:05, 20 January 2012
As you can see, each page has an associated talk page where people can put comments about the contents of the page without actually disturbing the page contents directly. Great for collaboration. --Vdanen 22:31, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Mediawiki links/info
Consult the User's Guide for information on using the wiki software.
Getting started
Remove Facebook Group
I'm thinking we can do without the link to the Facebook Group (just linking to the page instead), to avoid confusion. Or, is there a good place to put it for its "historical value"?
--Tbutler 21:43, 14 January 2012 (CST)
- Yes, that would be CATUG_websites#Historic_sites.
- Slightly disappointed that you had to ask, because there is a signpost of how to find that right under the Facebook link that you are talking about! It's meant to get people exploring using the Categories, but apparently it is too cryptic in practice. Oh dear. Perhaps I need to build more familiar-looking index pages.